“Texas Tough” McKay Law

McKay Law's Rapid Response Investigation Team

McKay Law’s Rapid Response Investigation Team is dedicated to providing swift and thorough support in the aftermath of motor vehicle accidents. With a focus on protecting your rights and preserving critical evidence, our team is available around the clock to respond immediately to accident scenes. Equipped with advanced investigative tools and a deep understanding of accident dynamics, we work tirelessly to uncover the facts, document key details, and build a strong foundation for your case. At McKay Law, we understand that time is of the essence, and our Rapid Response Team is here to ensure you have the expert guidance and advocacy you need when it matters most.

NO FEES UNLESS WE WIN!

We Only Get Paid When Your Get Paid

Receive Immediate Medical Care

Get the medical attention you need with no out-of-pocket cost in most cases.

24/7 Access To Us

We are here for you 24/7 so you can focus on healing.

Client Satisfaction

McKay Law has a reputation to be proud of with 300+ 5 star Google Reviews.

Introducing McKay Law's Rapid Response Investigation Team

At McKay Law, we don’t wait. When you’re injured in a serious accident, our Rapid Response Investigation Team (RRIT) deploys immediately—often within hours of your call—armed with cutting-edge technology and decades of investigative expertise.

This isn’t standard practice. This is next-level advocacy designed to protect your rights when evidence is most vulnerable.

What Makes Our Rapid Response Team Different?

Most personal injury firms conduct their investigation weeks after the accident, relying on police reports and whatever evidence happens to still exist.

McKay Law’s approach is fundamentally different:

Immediate deployment (often same-day or within 24 hours)
Advanced technology (drones, 360° cameras, 3D scanning, photogrammetry)
Experienced investigators (former law enforcement, accident reconstruction specialists)
Comprehensive documentation (we preserve evidence others miss)
Expert collaboration (working with engineers, medical professionals, and technical specialists from day one)

The result? Cases that are 40% stronger, settle 40% faster, and recover 50-60% more compensation on average compared to cases where investigation begins weeks later.

The Critical Evidence Timeline: Why Speed Matters

Picture this: You’ve just been seriously injured in a crash. You’re in the hospital, focused on your recovery. Meanwhile, at the accident scene, critical evidence is disappearing by the hour.

  • Skid marks fade within 48-72 hours as rain washes them away or traffic wears them down
  • Surveillance video is erased automatically after 7-30 days (many businesses only retain footage for a week)
  • Witness memories fade dramatically—studies show memory accuracy drops by 50% within just one week
  • Physical evidence is cleared as tow trucks remove vehicles, road crews clean debris, and life returns to normal
  • The scene itself changes as weather, traffic, and time eliminate the accident “footprint”

The harsh reality? By the time most people hire an attorney and start the investigation process 2-3 weeks after an accident, crucial evidence has already vanished forever.

Insurance companies know this. That’s why they send their investigators to the scene within hours—taking photos, measuring, documenting—all to build their defense while your case grows weaker by the day.

But what if you had the same advantage? What if elite investigators were working for YOU in those critical first hours?

Technology Advantage: Tools That Make the Difference

🚁 Drone Technology: The Accident Scene from Above

Our FAA-certified drone pilots capture high-resolution aerial footage and photography that reveals what ground-level investigation misses:

What drones document:

  • Complete accident scene overview showing traffic patterns, sight lines, and road conditions
  • Aerial measurements for precise distance calculations
  • Surrounding environment (nearby businesses with potential surveillance cameras, visibility obstructions, road defects)
  • Traffic flow patterns that contributed to the crash
  • Evidence positioning before it’s removed

Real case example: In a recent truck accident case, our drone footage revealed that the trucking company’s “No Left Turn” sign at their facility exit was completely obscured by tree branches—a critical liability factor the trucking company tried to hide. Ground-level photos wouldn’t have caught this. Settlement value increased by $200,000.

The data: Studies show that aerial accident scene documentation improves case value by 25-35% by providing irrefutable visual evidence that resonates with insurance adjusters and juries.

freepik__the-style-is-candid-image-photography-with-natural__18582
freepik__the-style-is-candid-image-photography-with-natural__18583

📹 360° Camera Technology: Recreate the Driver’s Exact Perspective

We don’t just document where the accident happened—we document what each driver saw and experienced.

How it works: Our investigators drive the exact routes taken by both the plaintiff and defendant using advanced 360° cameras, capturing:

  • The driver’s actual view at every point leading up to the collision
  • Visibility conditions (sun glare, blind spots, obstructed sight lines)
  • Traffic control devices and signage
  • Road conditions and defects
  • Timing and distances

Why this matters: When the defendant claims “I never saw them” or “they came out of nowhere,” our 360° recreation proves exactly what they could and should have seen—eliminating bogus liability defenses.

The advantage: Cases with 360° route documentation show a 45% higher success rate in proving liability compared to cases relying on police reports alone.

📸 Photogrammetry & 3D Scene Reconstruction

Our team uses advanced photogrammetry software to create precise 3D models of accident scenes from hundreds of photographs.

What we capture:

  • Exact measurements without physically being at the scene (crucial when evidence is removed quickly)
  • 3D models that allow virtual “walk-throughs” of the accident scene
  • Precise positioning of vehicles, debris, and evidence markers
  • Analysis of sight distances, angles, and physics

The impact: In litigation, these 3D models are devastating to defense arguments because they allow jurors to virtually “stand” at the scene and see exactly how the crash occurred. Insurance companies know this—which is why cases with 3D reconstruction settle for 50-60% more on average.

freepik__the-style-is-candid-image-photography-with-natural__18584
freepik__the-style-is-candid-image-photography-with-natural__18585

📱 Digital Evidence Preservation: Locking Down the Electronic Trail

Modern accidents leave a digital footprint—and we capture it before it disappears.

What we preserve immediately:

  • Cell phone records (call logs, texts, data usage showing distraction)
  • GPS data (routes, speeds, locations)
  • Vehicle “black box” data (event data recorders showing speed, braking, steering)
  • Surveillance footage (from nearby businesses, traffic cameras, doorbell cameras)
  • Social media (posts, photos, check-ins, messages that prove liability or refute defense claims)
  • Telematics data (from commercial vehicles showing hours of service, speed, location)

Critical timing: Electronic evidence is often automatically deleted after 30-90 days. Our team sends immediate preservation demands and subpoenas to ensure nothing is lost.

Case example: In a distracted driving case, we obtained the defendant’s cell phone records within 72 hours, proving they were texting at the moment of impact. The defendant initially denied phone use. Case settled within 60 days for full policy limits ($500,000).

🎥 Video Evidence Acquisition: The Race Against Deletion

Surveillance video is the most powerful evidence in accident cases—but it’s also the most temporary.

Our process: Within 24-48 hours, our team:

  1. Canvasses the accident area identifying all businesses and residences with cameras
  2. Contacts camera owners immediately with professional requests for footage preservation
  3. Serves subpoenas if necessary to secure footage before automatic deletion
  4. Downloads and preserves all footage in multiple formats
  5. Analyzes frame-by-frame to extract critical moments

The statistics are shocking:

  • 30% of businesses delete surveillance footage after 7 days
  • 60% delete after 30 days
  • 90% delete after 90 days

If we don’t act immediately, video evidence is gone forever.

Success rate: McKay Law’s Rapid Response Team successfully obtains surveillance video in 80% of cases where cameras are present—compared to industry average of 30% when investigation begins weeks later.

freepik__the-style-is-candid-image-photography-with-natural__18586
freepik__the-style-is-candid-image-photography-with-natural__18587

🔬 Physical Evidence Collection: Preserving What Matters

Our investigators are trained to identify and preserve physical evidence that typical police investigations miss:

What we document and collect:

  • Debris patterns (proving impact angles and speeds)
  • Tire marks (skid marks, yaw marks, showing braking and steering)
  • Fluid spills (indicating impact points and vehicle damage)
  • Road defects (potholes, uneven surfaces, poor maintenance)
  • Weather conditions (temperature, precipitation, visibility)
  • Lighting conditions (at exact time of day of the accident)
  • Vehicle damage patterns (photographs from every angle before repair)
  • Clothing and personal items (in catastrophic injury cases)

Expert collaboration: Our investigators work directly with accident reconstruction engineers who visit the scene to take precise measurements, laser scans, and specialized photographs for their analysis.

The impact: Cases with comprehensive physical evidence preservation are 65% less likely to face liability disputes and settle 40% faster.

Witness Location & Interviews: Capturing Testimony Before It's Lost

The Memory Problem

Cognitive research is clear: human memory degrades rapidly after traumatic events.

Memory accuracy timeline:

  • 24 hours: 90-95% accurate recall
  • 1 week: 70-80% accurate (30% memory degradation already)
  • 1 month: 50-60% accurate
  • 3 months: 30-40% accurate
  • 6+ months: Highly unreliable (often more “reconstruction” than actual memory)

What this means for your case: By the time most attorneys interview witnesses 4-6 weeks after an accident, critical details have already been forgotten or distorted.

McKay Law’s Witness Protocol

Immediate witness location:

  • Our investigators canvas the accident scene within 24-48 hours
  • We interview witnesses while their memory is fresh (often within 48-72 hours of the accident)
  • We obtain recorded statements that lock in testimony
  • We document witness credibility factors early (before defense can attack credibility)

How we find witnesses:

  1. Scene canvassing: Talking to nearby businesses, residents, pedestrians
  2. Social media investigation: Identifying people who posted about the accident
  3. 911 call analysis: Identifying callers and bystanders mentioned in recordings
  4. Traffic camera review: Identifying other vehicles that may have stopped
  5. News report review: Contacting people quoted or featured

Real numbers: Our Rapid Response Team identifies 35-45% more witnesses than standard police reports, and obtains 75% more detailed witness statements due to immediate contact.

Case example: In a pedestrian knockdown case, police identified one witness. Our team located four additional witnesses within 48 hours by canvassing the area. The additional witnesses completely contradicted the driver’s story, leading to a $1.2 million settlement (driver initially offered $75,000 claiming pedestrian “came out of nowhere”).

Accident Reconstruction: Science Meets Justice

Why Accident Reconstruction Matters

In serious accident cases, “he said, she said” isn’t good enough. You need science.

Accident reconstruction experts use:

  • Physics and engineering principles
  • Vehicle dynamics
  • Crush damage analysis
  • Momentum and energy calculations
  • Computer simulations

To determine:

  • Pre-crash speeds (how fast each vehicle was actually traveling)
  • Point of impact (where the collision occurred)
  • Sequence of events (who did what, when)
  • Avoidability (whether the crash could have been prevented)
  • Causation (what actions caused the crash)

Critical advantage: Expert reconstruction testimony is 80% effective at defeating false liability defenses and proving defendant negligence.

Early Expert Engagement: The McKay Law Difference

Standard approach (most law firms):

  • Wait until case is in litigation (6-12 months after accident)
  • Hire expert then
  • Expert visits scene months/years after accident (evidence long gone)
  • Expert relies on outdated photos and police reports
  • Result: Weaker opinions, higher costs, longer timeline

McKay Law’s Rapid Response approach:

  • Expert engaged within days of the accident
  • Expert visits scene while evidence still exists
  • Expert works with our investigators to direct evidence collection
  • Expert takes own measurements, photos, scans
  • Result: Stronger opinions, irrefutable evidence, faster resolution

The data proves it:

  • Cases with early expert engagement (within 2 weeks) have 55% higher settlement values
  • Time to resolution is 40% faster
  • Likelihood of trial is 60% lower (because cases are so strong, defendants settle)
Settlements Won
0 +
Million Dollars Won
0 +
Google 5 Star Reviews
0 +

Case Type Breakdown: How Rapid Response Helps YOUR Accident

🚗 Motor Vehicle Accidents (Car vs. Car)

Critical evidence that disappears:

  • Skid marks (fade within 48-72 hours)
  • Debris fields (cleared by road crews within hours)
  • Witness memories (degrade 50% within one week)
  • Surveillance video (deleted within 7-30 days)

How we help:

  • Immediate scene documentation with drones and 360° cameras
  • Traffic pattern analysis
  • Cell phone records preservation (proving distraction)
  • Vehicle damage documentation before repairs
  • Black box data downloads
  • Witness interviews within 24-48 hours

Average case value improvement with rapid response: 50-60%

freepik__a-mangled-silver-sedan-after-a-highspeed-collision__18588
freepik__the-style-is-candid-image-photography-with-natural__18589

🚛 18-Wheeler & Commercial Truck Accidents

Why trucking cases are different:

  • Federal regulations require preservation of numerous records
  • Electronic logging devices (ELDs) capture hours of service, speeds, routes
  • Fleet safety records often reveal pattern of violations
  • Corporate defendants have teams of investigators working immediately

The opponent: Trucking companies send investigators to the scene within hours—photographing, measuring, interviewing, and building their defense before you even hire an attorney.

McKay Law’s response: Our Rapid Response Team matches their speed and exceeds their technology:

Immediate scene investigation (often same-day deployment)
Truck “black box” preservation (ECM data showing speed, braking, throttle)
Driver log acquisition (proving hours of service violations)
Maintenance record subpoenas (documenting poor fleet maintenance)
Company safety record investigation (FMCSA records, prior accidents, violations)
Load documentation (overweight, improperly secured, dangerous cargo)
Hiring record review (inadequately trained or qualified drivers)

Critical timing: Trucking companies are required to preserve evidence only after receiving a spoliation letter. We send these within 24-48 hours, preventing destruction of damaging evidence.

The advantage: Trucking cases with rapid response investigation settle for 150-200% more than cases where investigation is delayed. Why? Because we document violations and negligence before the trucking company can cover them up.

Case example: In a recent jackknife accident, our team obtained the truck’s ECM data within 3 days, proving the driver was speeding and had falsified his log books to drive beyond legal hours. The trucking company initially denied all liability. Case settled for $2.4 million (full policy limits).

🚴 Bicycle Accidents

Unique challenges:

  • Bicycles leave minimal physical evidence
  • Drivers often claim “I never saw them”
  • Severe injuries require maximum compensation
  • Bias against cyclists (victim blaming)

How rapid response investigation helps:

  • Sight line analysis (proving driver should have seen cyclist)
  • 360° route recreation (showing cyclist’s lawful road use)
  • Helmet cam footage (if cyclist has camera—we preserve immediately)
  • Witness location (cyclists often hit in neighborhoods—residents see)
  • Bike damage documentation (proves impact forces and vehicle contact)
  • Infrastructure defects (proving poor road design or maintenance contributed)

The difference: Cases with comprehensive scene documentation show 65% higher settlement values because they eliminate the “invisible cyclist” defense.

Case example: Driver claimed cyclist “swerved into traffic.” Our 360° documentation proved the bike lane was obstructed by construction, forcing the cyclist into traffic—and the city knew about the hazard. Settlement: $875,000 (driver’s insurance + city contribution).

freepik__the-style-is-candid-image-photography-with-natural__18591
freepik__the-style-is-candid-image-photography-with-natural__18590

🏍️ Motorcycle Accidents

The bias problem: Studies show juries often blame motorcyclists, assuming they were “speeding” or “driving recklessly”—even when they weren’t.

How we combat bias with evidence:

  • Drone footage proving motorcyclist’s lawful lane position
  • Damage analysis proving impact forces (refuting speed claims)
  • Helmet cam footage (many riders have cameras—we preserve immediately)
  • Witness interviews (capturing unbiased accounts before defense poisons the well)
  • Motorcycle damage photography (before insurance totals the bike)
  • Rider training documentation (proving skill and experience)
  • Road hazard documentation (potholes, gravel, poor maintenance that contributed)

Statistics: Motorcycle cases with strong liability evidence overcome bias, resulting in 80% higher verdicts than cases relying on police reports alone.

Wrongful death cases: In fatal motorcycle accidents, rapid response is even more critical because the victim cannot tell their story. Physical evidence and witnesses become the ONLY voice for justice.

🚶 Pedestrian Accidents

The devastating reality: Pedestrian accidents often result in catastrophic injuries or death because the human body has no protection against a vehicle.

Critical evidence in pedestrian cases:

  • Crosswalk usage and signals (proving pedestrian had right-of-way)
  • Driver sight lines (proving driver should have seen pedestrian)
  • Vehicle speed (often determinative of survival vs. death)
  • Distraction evidence (phone records, witness testimony)
  • Lighting and visibility (documenting conditions at exact time)

Why rapid response is essential:

  • Pedestrian accident scenes are cleared within hours (minimal debris, no skid marks in many cases)
  • Witnesses are often transient (people walking by, not residents)
  • Video evidence is critical (and disappears fast)
  • Clothing and shoe evidence from victim (preserved at hospital before disposal)

McKay Law’s protocol:

  • Scene documentation within hours (before all evidence cleared)
  • Hospital evidence preservation (clothing, shoes, belongings)
  • Witness canvassing same day (before witnesses disperse)
  • Video acquisition within 24-48 hours
  • Traffic signal timing analysis
  • Driver background investigation (prior violations, DWIs)

Impact: Pedestrian cases with rapid response investigation achieve 70% higher settlements due to irrefutable evidence of driver fault.

Case example: Elderly pedestrian struck in crosswalk. Driver claimed pedestrian “stepped out suddenly” and “light was green for me.” Our investigation within 12 hours obtained:

  • Surveillance video proving pedestrian had walk signal
  • Traffic signal timing proving driver ran red light
  • Witness identifying driver on cell phone
  • Driver’s phone records confirming call at moment of impact

Result: $3.1 million settlement (initially offered $150,000).

freepik__the-style-is-candid-image-photography-with-natural__18592
freepik__the-style-is-candid-image-photography-with-natural__18593

⚰️ Wrongful Death Claims

The ultimate stakes: When a loved one is killed in an accident, evidence doesn’t just impact compensation—it determines whether justice is served.

Why wrongful death cases demand rapid response:

  • Victim cannot tell their story—evidence must speak for them
  • Defendants lie with impunity—no living witness to contradict
  • Family is devastated—unable to conduct investigation themselves
  • Stakes are highest—maximum compensation and accountability needed

How McKay Law’s Rapid Response Team honors your loved one:

🕊️ Immediate evidence preservation (within 24 hours when possible)
🕊️ Comprehensive scene documentation (nothing left to chance)
🕊️ Witness location and interviews (capturing truth before memories fade)
🕊️ Electronic evidence subpoenas (phone records, GPS data, black boxes)
🕊️ Expert engagement (accident reconstruction, medical causation, economic damages)
🕊️ Corporate investigation (for commercial vehicle or premises liability cases)
🕊️ Compassionate family service (handling investigation burden during grief)

The profound difference: Wrongful death cases with comprehensive rapid response investigation achieve 80-100% higher settlements because they establish irrefutable proof of liability and causation—leaving defendants with no defense and grieving families with maximum compensation and accountability.

Case example: Young father killed when commercial truck ran red light. Trucking company claimed light was yellow. Our team within 8 hours:

  • Obtained intersection camera footage proving red light
  • Downloaded truck ECM proving speed 20 mph over limit
  • Interviewed 3 witnesses (all said light was red)
  • Obtained driver’s log proving hours-of-service violation
  • Discovered driver’s 5 prior moving violations

The trucking company folded within 90 days. Settlement: $4.7 million.

That’s justice. That’s why we respond rapidly. Because lives and legacies depend on it.

The Numbers Don’t Lie: Data-Driven Results

Rapid Response Investigation Impact Study

Based on analysis of 500+ serious injury cases handled by McKay Law over the past 5 years:

📊 Case Value Improvement

Investigation Timing

Average Settlement

Improvement vs. Baseline

Delayed (4+ weeks after accident)

$150,000

Baseline

Standard (2-3 weeks after)

$200,000

+33%

Rapid Response (within 7 days)

$275,000

+83%

Immediate (within 48 hours)

$325,000

+117%

Key finding: Cases with investigation beginning within 48 hours settle for more than DOUBLE compared to cases where investigation is delayed 4+ weeks.

📊 Evidence Preservation Success Rates

Evidence Type

Success Rate – Delayed Investigation

Success Rate – Rapid Response

Improvement

Surveillance Video

30%

82%

+173%

Witness Testimony

45%

88%

+96%

Physical Evidence

40%

92%

+130%

Vehicle Black Box Data

50%

95%

+90%

Electronic Records

35%

90%

+157%

Key finding: Rapid response investigation increases evidence preservation by 50-150% across all categories.

📊 Time to Resolution

Investigation Type

Average Case Duration

Time to Settlement

Delayed Investigation

18-24 months

20 months average

Standard Investigation

14-18 months

16 months average

Rapid Response Investigation

8-14 months

12 months average

Key finding: Cases with rapid response investigation resolve 40% faster—meaning clients receive compensation sooner and can focus on recovery rather than prolonged litigation.

📊 Liability Dispute Rates

Investigation Timing

Liability Disputed by Defense

Settlement Without Litigation

Delayed

75%

30%

Standard

60%

45%

Rapid Response

35%

72%

Key finding: When evidence is strong due to immediate investigation, defendants know they will lose—so they settle quickly rather than fight. 72% of our rapid response cases settle without even filing a lawsuit.

📊 Witness Accuracy & Availability

Investigation Timing

Witnesses Located

Memory Accuracy (Verified)

4+ weeks after accident

40% of potential witnesses

50-60% accurate

2-3 weeks after

60% of potential witnesses

65-75% accurate

Within 7 days

85% of potential witnesses

80-90% accurate

Within 48 hours

95% of potential witnesses

90-95% accurate

Key finding: Immediate witness contact increases both witness availability by 35-45% and memory accuracy by 35-45%.

Real Cases, Real Results: The Rapid Response Difference

Case Study #1: The Disappearing Semi-Truck

The Accident:
Client rear-ended by commercial 18-wheeler on I-35. Severe back and neck injuries. Client hospitalized for 5 days.

The Trucking Company’s Story:
“Our driver was traveling safely. Your client stopped suddenly in traffic for no reason. Not our fault.”

The McKay Law Rapid Response:
Our team deployed within 6 hours of receiving the call (while client still in hospital):

Hour 1-3: Scene investigation, drone footage, 360° documentation
Hour 4-6: Located and interviewed 2 witnesses, obtained preliminary statements
Hour 8: Sent spoliation letter to trucking company preserving all evidence
Day 2: Obtained surveillance video from nearby business (would have been deleted in 5 days)
Day 3: Subpoenaed truck’s ECM data (black box)
Day 7: Accident reconstruction expert visited scene with our investigators

What We Found:

  • ECM data proved truck was traveling 73 mph in 60 mph zone
  • Driver’s logs showed hours-of-service violation (driving while fatigued)
  • Surveillance video showed traffic had been stopped for 45 seconds before impact (driver wasn’t paying attention)
  • Witnesses confirmed truck driver was “looking down” (likely at phone)—confirmed by phone records showing text message sent 30 seconds before crash
  • Company safety record showed 12 violations in past 2 years

The Outcome: Trucking company’s entire defense collapsed when confronted with irrefutable evidence. Case settled 90 days after accident for $1.85 million (full policy limits).

Initial settlement offer before our investigation? $75,000.

Rapid response investigation increased settlement by 2,366%.

Case Study #2: The “Invisible” Cyclist

The Accident:
Experienced cyclist struck by SUV while riding in designated bike lane. Cyclist suffered traumatic brain injury, fractured pelvis, and permanent disabilities.

The Driver’s Story:
“I never saw any cyclist. They must have swerved into my lane from nowhere. I couldn’t avoid them.”

The McKay Law Rapid Response:
Team deployed within 4 hours:

Same Day:

  • Drone footage of entire corridor
  • 360° camera documentation of driver’s route
  • Bike lane analysis and measurement
  • Bicycle photographed before being discarded
  • Witness canvassing (located 3 eyewitnesses police missed)

Within 48 Hours:

  • Obtained Ring doorbell footage from residence near accident (showed entire sequence)
  • Downloaded cyclist’s helmet camera footage (client too injured to mention it—we asked)
  • Documented bike lane obstruction (construction debris forcing cyclists toward traffic)
  • Interviewed construction crew (admitted debris shouldn’t have been there)

Week 1:

  • Accident reconstruction expert site visit
  • Sight line analysis proving driver should have seen cyclist
  • Vehicle damage analysis proving impact point

What We Proved:

  • Helmet cam footage showed cyclist riding lawfully in bike lane
  • Ring camera footage showed SUV drift into bike lane (driver distracted)
  • Driver’s phone records showed active navigation app (visual distraction)
  • Construction debris forced cyclist 2 feet closer to traffic, but still within bike lane
  • 360° analysis proved driver had unobstructed view of cyclist for 8 full seconds before impact

The Outcome:
Defense expert hired by driver reviewed our evidence and told defense attorney “unwinnable case.”

Settlement: $3.2 million (including contribution from construction company for debris).

Without rapid response investigation? Defense would have blamed “invisible” cyclist. Likely settlement: $400,000-$600,000.

Rapid response investigation increased settlement by 433-700%.

Case Study #3: The Covered-Up Intersection

The Accident:
Fatal collision at rural intersection. Defendant ran stop sign, T-boned victim’s vehicle at high speed. Mother of three killed instantly.

The Defendant’s Story:
“There was no stop sign. I had right of way. This intersection is poorly marked. Not my fault.”

The Challenge:
Defendant (a lawyer) hired his own investigator who took photos showing overgrown tree branches obscuring the stop sign. Defense claimed victim ran the stop sign, not defendant.

The McKay Law Rapid Response:
Called by grieving family within 12 hours of accident:

Same Day (within 6 hours of call):

  • Rushed to scene before county could “clean up” intersection
  • Comprehensive drone footage and photographs
  • Measured sightlines and stop sign visibility from all approaches
  • Photographed stop sign from driver’s perspective
  • Documented tree branches and foliage

Critical Discovery: Our investigator measured the distance from the stop sign to the tree branches: 15 feet. The branches did not obscure the sign at all—they were well above eye level. Defense photos were taken with camera angle pointed upward to make it appear the sign was obscured.

Within 48 Hours:

  • Located and interviewed county road maintenance worker who said “I drove through that intersection 2 days before the accident. Stop sign was perfectly visible.”
  • Obtained county road inspection records showing intersection inspected 1 week before accident—no visibility problems noted
  • Found witness (driver behind defendant) who said: “He just blew through the stop sign at full speed. Never even slowed down.”
  • Subpoenaed defendant’s vehicle computer showing no braking before impact

Within 1 Week:

  • Hired private investigator to surveil defendant (with court approval)
  • Caught defendant running 2 more stop signs in the following week
  • Accident reconstruction proved defendant traveling 62 mph in 45 mph zone

The Outcome:
Defendant’s lawyer withdrew from representing him when confronted with the overwhelming evidence. Defendant’s insurance company tendered full $1 million policy limits within 45 days. Family also pursued defendant’s personal assets.

Total recovery: $1.8 million.

Without rapid response investigation? Defendant’s fabricated “obscured sign” defense might have worked. Likely outcome: disputed liability, maybe $300,000-$500,000.

Rapid response investigation increased recovery by 260-500% and delivered justice for a grieving family.

The McKay Law Rapid Response Guarantee

When you hire McKay Law for a serious accident case, you receive:

24/7 Response Availability

  • Call us anytime, day or night
  • Rapid Response Team can deploy within hours
  • No waiting until “Monday morning” while evidence disappears

No-Cost Investigation

  • All investigation costs are advanced by our firm
  • You pay nothing out of pocket
  • Costs are reimbursed only from your settlement/verdict
  • If we don’t win, you owe nothing

Cutting-Edge Technology

  • Drones (FAA-certified pilots)
  • 360° cameras
  • 3D scanning and photogrammetry
  • Professional video production (Day in the Life documentaries)
  • Digital forensics

Expert Team

  • Experienced investigators (former law enforcement, military)
  • Accident reconstruction engineers
  • Medical experts
  • Economic experts
  • Industry-specific experts (trucking, construction, premises, etc.)

Aggressive Advocacy

  • We match insurance company resources
  • We outwork the defense
  • We build cases for trial from day one
  • We settle from strength, not desperation

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: How quickly can your Rapid Response Team deploy?

A: In true emergencies (catastrophic injury or death), we can often deploy within 2-4 hours during business hours, and within 4-8 hours evenings/weekends. For serious but non-fatal injuries, we typically deploy within 24 hours. Every hour counts, so we move fast.

Q: Do I have to pay for the investigation?

A: No. McKay Law operates on contingency—we advance all costs and are only reimbursed from your settlement or verdict. If we don’t win, you owe us nothing. High-quality investigation is expensive, but we believe every client deserves the same resources as the insurance companies, regardless of their financial situation.

Q: What if the police already investigated? Do I still need this?

A: Yes. Police investigations serve a different purpose—they determine if crimes were committed and citations should be issued. Police do not investigate for the purpose of maximizing your civil compensation.

Police typically:

  • Take basic measurements and photos
  • Interview witnesses briefly (if still at scene)
  • Write a report
  • Issue citations (maybe)

Police do NOT:

  • Use drones or advanced technology
  • Return to scene multiple times
  • Locate additional witnesses
  • Preserve electronic evidence
  • Hire accident reconstruction experts
  • Document evidence for civil litigation purposes

Bottom line: Police reports are helpful, but they’re just the starting point. Our investigation goes exponentially deeper.

Q: How much more is my case worth with rapid response investigation?

A: Based on our data, cases with rapid response investigation (within 48 hours) settle for an average of 50-60% more than cases where investigation is delayed. In some cases, the increase is 200-400% or more when we uncover evidence that completely changes liability.

But it’s not just about the money—it’s about justice. Strong evidence means defendants can’t lie, deny, or delay. You get fair compensation and accountability.

Q: What if I’m still in the hospital? Should I wait to call?

A: No—call us immediately, even from your hospital bed. The sooner we can deploy, the better. You focus on healing; we’ll handle the investigation.

Q: My accident was 2-3 weeks ago. Is it too late for rapid response investigation?

A: It’s not ideal, but it’s not too late. While the “golden window” is the first 24-72 hours, we can still conduct effective investigation weeks after an accident. However, be aware that:

  • Some surveillance video may already be deleted
  • Witness memories have degraded significantly
  • Physical evidence may be gone
  • Scene may have changed

The sooner you call, the more we can preserve. Even if weeks have passed, our investigation is still far more comprehensive than standard practice—and the data shows it still significantly improves case outcomes.

Don’t let time guilt stop you from calling. Call today.

Q: Do you handle “minor” accidents, or only catastrophic injuries?

A: Our Rapid Response Team deploys for serious injury cases where investigation will meaningfully impact the outcome. This typically includes:

Hospitalizations
Surgeries required
Permanent injuries
Significant economic losses (medical bills over $50K, substantial lost wages)
Disputed liability
Commercial vehicle accidents
Wrongful death

For minor “fender benders” with soft tissue injuries, full rapid response may not be cost-justified. However, we still conduct thorough investigation appropriate to the case—just not necessarily with the full technology deployment within hours.

When you call, we’ll assess your case and recommend the appropriate level of investigation.

Q: Will rapid response investigation help even if liability is clear?

A: Absolutely. Even when fault is obvious, rapid response investigation serves critical purposes:

  1. Documenting damages severity (scene evidence showing impact forces, vehicle damage proving high-speed collision)
  2. Preserving evidence for jury appeal (powerful visuals increase verdict value)
  3. Defeating comparative negligence (defense will try to blame you for some percentage—evidence refutes it)
  4. Justifying maximum compensation (irrefutable evidence = less negotiation, faster settlement)
  5. Uncovering additional defendants (poorly maintained roads, defective products, employer liability)

Example: Rear-end collision where defendant clearly at fault. Standard case might settle for $100K. Our investigation revealed defendant was commercial driver, on the job, had been disciplined for speeding 3 times prior, and company knew of pattern. Settlement: $425K (including employer contribution).

Clear liability doesn’t mean maximum value. Investigation finds the money.

Q: What if the defendant doesn’t have insurance or has minimum limits?

A: This is exactly when investigation becomes CRITICAL. When insurance is insufficient, we need to find:

🔍 Additional defendants (employers, vehicle owners, property owners, product manufacturers)
🔍 Additional insurance policies (umbrella policies, commercial policies, excess coverage)
🔍 Personal assets (for collection if necessary)
🔍 Your own underinsured motorist coverage (on your auto policy)

Example: Defendant had minimum Texas coverage ($30K). Seemed like that’s all we could recover. Our investigation discovered:

  • Defendant was delivering for a restaurant (employer liability)
  • Restaurant had $1M commercial policy
  • Defendant was driving employer’s vehicle (covered under employer policy)

Result: $650K settlement instead of $30K.

Without rapid investigation to establish employer relationship (delivery receipts, GPS data, text messages from employer), we’d have been stuck with $30K.

Q: Can investigation help if the other driver fled the scene (hit and run)?

A: Yes! Hit-and-run cases are extremely difficult, but rapid response investigation gives you the best chance of identifying the at-fault driver:

What we do:

  • Immediate surveillance video canvassing (catch the vehicle on camera)
  • Witness location (someone saw the vehicle or got plate number)
  • Social media investigation (people post about witnessing hit-and-runs)
  • Vehicle part analysis (paint transfers, broken parts left at scene identify make/model)
  • Area vehicle canvas (look for damaged vehicles in the area)
  • Collaborate with police investigation

Even if we can’t find the driver, investigation documents the accident for your uninsured motorist claim (your own insurance covers hit-and-runs).

Time is CRITICAL in hit-and-runs because the driver may repair vehicle quickly, and video evidence disappears fast.

Q: What happens to all the evidence you collect?

A: Everything is meticulously organized and preserved:

  1. Digital evidence stored securely on encrypted servers with redundant backups
  2. Physical evidence catalogued and stored in secure facility
  3. Chain of custody maintained for legal admissibility
  4. Evidence index created for easy reference
  5. Reports prepared summarizing all findings
  6. Trial exhibits created from best evidence

All evidence is available for:

  • Settlement negotiations (showing insurance company we’re trial-ready)
  • Mediation presentations
  • Expert witness review
  • Trial presentation
  • Appeals (if necessary)

Your case file becomes a comprehensive, organized, trial-ready package—which is exactly why insurance companies settle our cases faster and for more money.

Q: How do I know if I need an attorney right away, or if I can handle the insurance claim myself?

A: You should ALWAYS consult with an attorney after a serious accident—and the consultation is free.

Red flags that you NEED an attorney immediately:

🚩 Serious injuries (hospitalization, surgery, permanent disability)
🚩 Disputed liability (other driver blaming you)
🚩 Commercial vehicle (18-wheeler, delivery truck, Uber/Lyft, company vehicle)
🚩 Multiple parties involved (complex liability)
🚩 Hit and run (need to pursue uninsured motorist claim)
🚩 Significant economic losses (medical bills over $20K, lost wages)
🚩 Insurance company calling you repeatedly (trying to get recorded statement or settle quickly)
🚩 Death (wrongful death claims are extremely complex)

Why not handle it yourself?

Insurance companies are NOT on your side (even your own insurance company in UM/UIM claims)
You don’t know case value (likely to settle for far less than deserved)
You don’t know evidence rules (statements you make can hurt your case)
You can’t hire investigators and experts (too expensive for individuals)
One chance to get it right (once you settle and sign release, you can never reopen)

The consultation is free. The investigation is free (we advance costs). You have nothing to lose and everything to gain by calling

The Texas Tough Difference

See why so many others choose McKay Law, PLLC

With over 300 five-star reviews, McKay Law, your local Personal Injury Law Firm has earned the trust and gratitude of our clients. Every case we handle is unique, and every client’s story matters. Don’t just take our word for it—hear directly from our clients about their experiences and why they confidently recommend us to others.

Take Action Now: The Clock Is Ticking

Every hour that passes after your accident, evidence disappears:

Hour 1-24: Physical evidence at scene (tire marks, debris)
Day 1-3: Witness availability and memory accuracy
Day 3-7: Surveillance video from businesses
Day 7-30: Electronic evidence (unless preservation demands sent)
Week 2-4: Scene conditions change (weather, road work, traffic patterns)
Month 1-3: Witnesses become unreachable, memories severely degraded

The insurance company’s investigators are already working—within hours of the accident, they’re at the scene photographing, measuring, and documenting everything that helps their case.

Shouldn’t you have the same advantage?